Brazil has a lackluster record when it comes to being a leader for Latin America on issues of human rights and democracy. While it does not join the ALBA alliance in voting against human rights at the UN Human Rights Council, it also fails to speak up and promote human rights in venues such as the OAS Permanent Council, preferring to remain silent. Despite the fact that Brazil, under former President Dilma Rousseff failed to make any voluntary contributions to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR or the Commission), and until the last moment supported a plan to gut the inter-American system, since her impeachment, Rousseff has appealed to the Commission for a hearing on whether her rights had been violated in the process. Brazil’s participation in the OAS and the inter-American system has improved under the government of President Michele Temer, including in the serious, qualified candidate it nominated for the three open seats on the IACHR. Despite the shift, and perhaps for obvious reasons, Brazil has not led a shift in the discussions and votes on Venezuela in the OAS.
Below is a breakdown of Brazil’s actions and votes at the various venues we are monitoring. For more information click on each title and summary.
Scoreboard:
Freedom House | |
Freedom Status | Free |
Aggregate Score (100 is perfect freedom and protection of rights) | 75/100 |
Political Rights (scores out of 40, with 40 being the best) | 31/40 |
Civil Liberties (scores out of 60, with 60 being the best) | 44/60 |
Reporters Without Borders | |
World Press Freedom Index (scores out of 100, with 1 being the best) | 34/100 |
Transparency International | |
Corruption Perception Index (CPI) | 35/100 |
Global Rank | 106/180 |
World Justice Project [1] | |
Rule-of-Law Index | 0.52 |
Regional rank | 16/30 |
Global rank | 67/128 |
UN Human Development Index | |
Human Development Index | 0.765 |
Global rank | 84 |
Americas Quarterly (last report 2016) | |
Social Inclusion Index | 82.57/100 |
Regional rank | 2/15 |
United Nations System:
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC or Council)
Brazil is currently on the Council and their term expires in 2022. It was previously on the Council from 2012-2019. It has largely voted to uphold human rights at the Council on the issue of Syria and North Korea, but has abstained on Ukraine.
UNHRC’s Universal Periodic Review
As part of its mandate to promote human rights around the globe, the UNHRC has instituted a Universal Periodic Review, where, once every four years, each country’s human rights record is examined. Other countries are invited to review the record and make comments and suggestions for improvement. The country under review then acknowledges each comment by either “accepting” the comment, meaning typically that they agree to focus on, or “noting” it, indicating that they disagree and will not be focusing on improvements in this area.
UN NGO Committee
Brazil has not been on the Committee since at least 1993.
Inter-American System:
OAS Permanent Council
Under the former leadership of Secretary General Luis Almagro, the OAS has re-found its focus on defending democracy but is still bound by the wishes and will of its members. But the newfound leader’s commitment—and the challenges—were shown at a meeting in June 2016 where Almagro presented his report on the state of democracy in Venezuela and proposed invoking the Inter-American Democratic Charter.
Brazil was noticeably quiet during the Permanent Council in June 2016, making few comments when Secretary General Luis Almagro presented his report laying out the evidence on how and why it was necessary to invoke the Inter-American Democratic Charter in Venezuela. Despite endless procedural hurdles thrown up by Venezuela and its allies, the Permanent Council eventually got to a vote, albeit on the procedural issue of the agenda and whether Almagro should present his report at all. That vote succeeded, despite lackluster support, Brazil joining the majority to allow Almagro to present his findings.
Brazil joined the majority once again, when at the 2017 OAS General Assembly it voted in favor of a resolution that called for the release of political prisoners and urged the Venezuelan government not to convene a constituent assembly that would rewrite the Venezuelan constitution. However, the resolution did not receive the votes needed to pass.
Inter-American Commission for Human Rights (IACHR or Commission)
During the 2017 OAS General Assembly, Brazilian candidate, Flávia Cristina Piovesan was elected as a new member to the IACHR. In 2016, President Michel Temer appointed Piovesan Special Secretary for Human Rights. She is also a professor of constitutional law and human rights at the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo and is best known for her fight against the criminalization of abortion. She was highly rated by our evaluations of the candidates and supported broadly within the human rights community.
Brazil engages positively with the Commission at their thematic hearings, actively attending and asking for hearings on topics of concern in the country to demonstrate how they are tackling those issues. However, when it comes to voluntary funding, Brazil gives nothing beyond its member quota to the OAS.
Electoral Missions
Brazil had their first OAS missions to monitor their general election in 2016. They have only had one other mission in 2020 to observe their municipal elections.
Freedom of Information Laws
Since 2000 the right to information and freedom of information laws have expanded across the region. However, the existence of the laws on the books does not necessarily mean full enforcement.
Women’s rights:
Protecting women against gender-based violence is a human rights issue often overlooked globally even though it crosses social, economic and national boundaries. And according to the United Nations Population Fund, gender-based violence undermines the health, security, dignity, and autonomy of its victims. Although 16 countries in Latin America had modified their laws to include a specific type of crime referring to the murder of women by 2015, they are not uniformly implemented, and practices to convict perpetrators of gender-based violence are still extremely weak. A 2016 report published by the Small Arms Survey found that Latin America and the Caribbean is home to 14 of the 25 countries with the highest rates of femicide in the world.
Indigenous rights:
7.8 percent of the population in Latin America, roughly 41,813,039 people, identify as indigenous, 49 percent of them live in urban areas and 51 percent live in rural areas.
The Labour Organization’s Convention 169 (ILO 169)
The Labour Organization’s Convention 169 (ILO169)—which has the status of an international treaty—establishes the right of indigenous and tribal peoples to be consulted when a policy or project affects their culture or heritage through what is commonly called “previous and informed consent.” The vaguely worded treaty has been a point of contention in some countries, among governments, investors and communities; and progress in implementing it has been uneven. The Convention has been interpreted, in particular, as applying to issues of national resource extraction and infrastructure development that affect communal lands. In Latin America 16 countries have signed ILO 169.
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People’s (UNDRIP)
Adopted by the UN General Assembly in September 2007, all Latin American countries, except Colombia, which abstained, voted in favor of this declaration. The only four countries to initially reject this declaration were the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand. While it is not a legally binding instrument, it is an “important standard” for the treatment of indigenous people. The declaration sets out the collective and individual rights of indigenous peoples, as well as their rights to culture, identity, language, employment, health, education, and other issues. It prohibits discrimination against indigenous peoples and promotes their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them and their right to remain distinct and to pursue their own visions of economic and social development. The end goal is to encourage countries to work alongside indigenous communities to solve global issues, like development, multicultural democracy and decentralization.
American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People
In 2016, the General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) approved the American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples after a long negotiation of 17 years. The declaration recognizes the collective organization and multicultural character of indigenous peoples, the self-identification of people who consider themselves indigenous and special protection for peoples in voluntary isolation or initial contact. However, the declaration was met with resistance by members of the indigenous community, who complained that they did not have full participation in the negotiations and that the declaration rolled back several rights recognized in UNDRIP. The declaration does not mention the right to previous and informed consultation.
Previous to the declaration, in 1990, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) had created the Office of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to devote attention to Indigenous Peoples in the Americas and to “strengthen, promote, and systemize the IACHR’s own work in this area. The current Rapporteur on the Right of Indigenous Peoples is Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli, Ambassador of Peru to Spain from 2012 to 2014 and Minister of the Office of Justice. He received a law degree from the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru with a master’s degree in Constitutional Law and a PhD in Humanities. Former Rapporteurs include, Rose-Marie Belle Antoine a former IACHR Commissioner and Dinah Shelton an international law consultant for the World Health Organization, the United Nations Environment Programme among other organizations.